COLOMBIA ANALYSIS: Seventy-five days of President Santos



29 November 2010
COLOMBIA ANALYSIS: Seventy-five days of President

by Pierre Shantz

On 7 August, Juan Manuel Santos replaced Alvaro Uribe
Velez as president of Colombia.  From
2006 to 2009 Santos held the position of Minister of Defense in Uribe’s
government.  He is seen by some as a
brilliant strategist, because he was at the helm when the army killed one of
the highest-ranking commanders of the FARC (Colombia’s largest insurgency
group) and rescued fifteen high-profile hostages. He is seen by others as a
gruesome killer. While defense minister, media networks broke the story of the
“False Positives” scandal in which Colombia’s armed forces killed
more than 2000 civilians and claimed they were enemies killed in combat to get
financial and other rewards.

Now Santos is president. His actions have taken many
by surprise and have caused suspicion. Three days after he took office he
invited Uribe’s worst political enemy, neighboring Venezuelan President Hugo
Chavez to Colombia to repair the broken relationship.  He has personally asked Congress to pass the
“Victims Law” and “Land Restitution Law,” two laws Uribe
had prevented from passing. Santos has recently announced that he will not push
Colombia’s Congress to ratify the military agreement signed between the U.S.A.
and Colombia, an agreement that Uribe defended at the risk of isolating
Colombia from the rest of Latin America. But is Santos really that much

Both men come from a background of wealth and
privilege. Uribe grew up as the son of wealthy cattle ranchers. He studied at
Harvard and Oxford and held, among other offices, that of Governor, Senator and
President. Santos’ family is one of Colombia’s media mogul families who own the
largest distributed newspaper and publishing house. The Santos family name goes
back to Colombia’s independence from Spain and has been part of its elite ever

One can begin to understand the difference in
governing styles between Uribe and Santos when one looks at the source of their
power and money. As Francisco Campo, partner and adviser to CPT Colombia, says,
“Uribe and Santos are equally intelligent and perverse, only different in
that Uribe wanted a feudal bourgeois state and Santos is looking for a modern
bourgeois state. Uribe’s cabinet was filled with people from his party who were
not necessarily were right for the job, but who bowed to him as King. Santos,
on the other hand, has people from diverse political sectors and who have merit
to be in these positions.”

One cannot forget that the socio-economic-political
class that Santos comes from has ruled Colombia since it’s declared independence
200 years ago, and has very successfully created a wide power and wealth gap between
the rich and the poor. Is Santos really looking to change all that? Or is he
trying to clean up Colombia’s image tarnished by so many scandals left from his

A recent human rights report published by Coordination
of Europe, Colombia and the United States, entitled, “The Words and the Deeds “The first 75 days of the Santos’
Government and the Situation in Defense of Human Rights
, claims that during
the first three months of the Juan Manuel Santos government, twenty-two
activists have been killed (six human rights activists, seven indigenous leaders,
five trade unionists, two community educators, and two members of the LGBTQ
community). According to the report there has been an apparent “change in
style” from the last presidential regime but that the situation on the
ground is still much the same as it was under Uribe.


Subscribe to the Friday Bulletin

Get Hannah’s thoughts and the entire bulletin every Friday in your inbox, and don’t miss out on news from the teams, a list of what we’re reading and information on ways to take action.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Read More Stories

Three Israeli soldiers patrol the streets in Hebron.

Mymwna is a martyr

Just like that, in a few seconds, a life was taken, a soul disappeared, and a dream remained unachieved.

Skip to content