CPT Turtle Island Solidarity Network has joined a diverse group in the Great Plains region (midwest USA) to organize and combat the greenwashing of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) pipelines. We demand climate change solutions that respect the land, water, human rights, and the planet.
In a mad rush, corporate groups have proposed an expansive web of CCS pipelines for the midwest. This scheme, disguised as combating climate change, will redirect tax dollars from known green solutions and instead give a crutch to the dying fossil fuel industry.
CCS is a technical process that The Science and Environmental Health Network (SHEN) describes on their website as “ an experimental technology to capture carbon dioxide gas (CO2) from the smokestacks of power plants, pressurize it until it turns into a liquid, send it somewhere through a long high-pressure pipeline, then pump it about a mile below ground, hoping it will stay there forever.”
Another principal use of captured carbon is to inject it into depleted oil fields to extract more oil in a process called Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR). Pipeline companies with their eyes on the Great Plains have stated that they will not restrict carbon carried on their lines from being used to extract more fossil fuels.
Indigenous communities are resisting the project and have spoken out about the dangers to the land and water. Hundreds of farmers and landowners are also organizing to stop the use of eminent domain, a process where the company asks for permission to use private property against the owner’s wishes. Environmental, human rights and community organizations and lawmakers are all joining together. This is a call from a group whose diversity is unlike any in recent history, united in saying: “NO CARBON PIPELINES!”
The Great Plains Action Society hosted an informational webinar in December 2021, titled “Prairie Not Pipelines – Carbon Capture and Sequestration in the Great Plains and Indian Country.” Donielle Wanatee, Meskwaki Nation member and grassroots leader in the resistance to the Dakota Access Pipeline, stated: “I don’t think we have to wait anymore. We can actually stop them if we want to,” reflecting on the lessons learned from the fight to stop the Dakota Access pipeline. “Indigenous people, we are aware of this forked-tongue speaking that the white man gives to people when they want to gain profit or money off of this kind of thing—off of taking resources or assets that are meant for humankind or human beings.”
The resistance group also includes hundreds of rural farmers and landowners. Mark Gannon said to the Des Moines Register on 2 February 2022, “I am a farm manager in Iowa and lines would go through eight tracts of land I manage. Most of these farms are long-term ownership, some with over 100 years in the same family. All oppose these projects, but we feel the deck is stacked against us before we get started.”
Farmers and landowners have been working together with various organizations, lawyers, and Iowa lawmakers to introduce a bill that will limit the use of eminent domain for private profit. If this bill is passed, it will effectively prevent the CO2 pipeline projects from being built in Iowa without landowner consent and stop these dangerous greenwashing projects from going any further. This is currently the first line of defence in the midwest.
“So far, the conversation has generally revolved around white landowners in Iowa, Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, and how they are being affected via eminent domain,” reflected Sikowis Nobiss, founder of The Great Plains Action Society. “Their input is very important on this because obviously, they are the owners now of this land, so that’s the first offence or defence to stop these pipelines from coming in. However, we can not forget that all of this land is stolen.”
Watch the full webinar on Youtube at Great Plains Action Society.
- “Starting from a harmonic reading of the article, 18 and 19 of the Constitution, as well as the constitutional realm, it is possible to conclude that the guarantee of conscientious objection to military service does spawn from the articles mentioned above, and that, even if the constitutional guarantee from which it is possible to state conscientious objections to the different judicial duties requires a legislative development, its absence does not imply the inefficiency of the right, which, in in its essential nucleus, can be made valid directly based on the Constitution.”Constitutional Court, Sentence C-728 of 2009, page 5.
- “Referentes normativos del bloque de constitucionalidad como el que se desprende de la Resolución 1989/59 adoptada por la Comisión de Derechos Humanos de las Naciones Unidas, sobre objeción de conciencia al servicio militar, la cual se da, entre otras, ‘reconociendo el derecho de toda persona a tener objeciones de conciencia al servicio militar como ejercicio legítimo del derecho a la libertad de pensamiento, de conciencia y de religión enunciado en el artículo 18 de la Declaración Universal de Derechos Humanos y en el artículo 18 del Pacto Internacional de Derechos Civiles y Políticos’.” Sentence C-728 of 2009, page 3.
- Incorporation: CHAPTER II. MILITARY SITUATION DEFINITION: Art. 17 TO 28, Law 1861 of 2017.
- We have changed the youth´s name by his request to protect his identity.
- Excerpt of response to Andrés by the Fourth Recruitment Zone.
- ART. 17. INSCRIPTION. PARAGRAPH 4. Until before incorporation to the military ranks, the citizen will have to manifest in written or verbal form if they are aware of falling into any of the exemption from Military service category or any other circumstance that precludes their ability to render military service.
- Numeral 23: Detention against those who have declared expressly to be conscientious objectors has no judicial support nor legal base and their incorporation into the army against their will is a clear act of violence to their pillars of conscience, which can violate art. 18 of the International Pact for Human and Political Rights. Not to provide space to the right of conscientious objection can be a violation of such an article. Neither have legal base or judicial support for all the practices of batidas, raids or levy, with the purpose of detaining on the street and public places all the youth that cannot give credit to their military situation. (Pag. 5). Microsoft Word – Opinin 8 2008 ColombiaB (wri-irg.org)